From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Inside the Regex Engine |
Date: | 2003-12-03 15:47:34 |
Message-ID: | 3FCE0596.2010307@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>david(at)fetter(dot)org (David Fetter) writes:
>
>
>>While PL/Perl is great, it's not available everywhere, and I'd like to
>>be able to grab atoms from a regex match in, say, a SELECT. Is there
>>some way to get access to them?
>>
>>
>
>There's a three-parameter variant of substring() that allows extraction
>of a portion of a regex match --- unfortunately it uses SQL99's
>brain-dead notion of regex, which will not satisfy any Perl weenie :-(
>
>I think it'd be worth our while to define some comparable functionality
>that depends only on the POSIX regex engine ...
>
>
substitute should be relatively straightforward, I guess; split and
match maybe less so - what do you return? An array? Or you could require
an explicit subscript to get a particular return value as in
split_part(), which would be potentially inefficient if you want more
than one (although I guess results could be cached).
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2003-12-03 16:07:20 | Re: Encoding problem with 7.4 |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-12-03 15:15:39 | Re: Encoding problem with 7.4 |