| From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jason Tesser <JTesser(at)nbbc(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Triggers, Stored Procedures, PHP. was: Re: PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2003-12-01 20:55:16 |
| Message-ID: | 3FCBAAB4.5060306@Yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Jason Tesser wrote:
> Quoted as gospel by various people:
>>> MySQL cannot even handle sub-queries yet.
>
>> BTW, is that really still true? I thought they had at least some
>> support for subqueries by now.
>
> yes sub queries in 4.1 which is still alpha
"yes sub queries" is IMHO as precise as "yes foreign keys" ... look,
they have foreign key support, but do they have DEFERRED, ON DELETE SET
NULL, ON UPDATE CASCADE, all the stuff that makes it complete?
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ruth Hsieh | 2003-12-01 20:56:40 | pg_dump on one user not whole database |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-12-01 20:53:59 | Re: Specify a column without using its name |