Re: Limiting factors of pg_largeobject

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Limiting factors of pg_largeobject
Date: 2003-11-26 22:37:49
Message-ID: 3FC52B3D.1090008@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


>pg_largeobject already has an index (which is used by all the LO
>operations). Again, don't see what the width of the object ID column
>has to do with it.
>
>
I was more after the not having an OID than the width of the ID column.

> regards, tom lane
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>

--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michal Zaborowski 2003-11-26 22:58:46 Re: Size on Disk
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-11-26 22:25:53 Re: Limiting factors of pg_largeobject