From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrea Grassi <andreagrassi(at)sogeasoft(dot)com>, Darko(dot)Prenosil(at)finteh(dot)hr, shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in |
Subject: | Re: Problem with dblink |
Date: | 2003-11-21 19:32:36 |
Message-ID: | 3FBE6854.9090103@joeconway.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Looks right to me; but as a general tip, if you've made mistake X in
> place A, you might have made it in place B too. Have you checked the
> rest of dblink for forgotten SPI_finish calls?
Good tip -- will do. Though, I suspect the dblink_build_sql_* functions
have been much more lightly used than the rest of dblink, and that's the
only reason this bug has lurked for so long.
> (More generally, I wonder if AtEOXact_SPI oughtn't be fixed to emit
> a WARNING if the SPI stack isn't empty, except in the error case.
> Neglecting SPI_finish is analogous to a resource leak, and we have
> code in place to warn about other sorts of leaks.)
I'll take a look at this too.
> Sure. I believe we still intend a 7.3.5 shortly (maybe early December,
> since Thanksgiving week is a bad time to expect anything to happen).
>
OK -- then I'll plan to apply the final fix to REL7_3_STABLE as well.
Thanks,
Joe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-11-21 22:45:23 | Re: COMMENT ON mega patch |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-11-21 19:23:30 | Re: Problem with dblink |