From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Build farm |
Date: | 2003-11-19 19:27:31 |
Message-ID: | 3FBBC423.9000801@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>The Samba build daemon suite is pretty good. We have a couple of those
>hosts in our office in fact. (I think they're building PostgreSQL
>regularly as well.) A tip: You might find that adopting the source code
>of the Samba suite to PostgreSQL is harder than writing a new one.
>
>
Yes, I agree. I have looked at it for ideas, but not for code. I'm not
using rsync or anything like that, for instance. I'm going for something
very simple to start with.
Essentially what I have is something like this pseudocode:
cvs update
check if there really was an update and if not exit
configure; get config.log
make 2>&1 | make-filter >makelog
make check 2>&1 | check-filter > checklog
(TBD) send config status, make status, check status, logfiles
make distclean
The send piece will probably be a perl script using LWP and talking to a
CGI script.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2003-11-19 19:35:35 | Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the |
Previous Message | Nigel J. Andrews | 2003-11-19 19:10:35 | Re: Commercial binary support? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-11-19 19:40:25 | Re: Site designs, upgrades, and Konqueror |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-11-19 18:18:28 | Re: Build farm |