Background writer committed

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Background writer committed
Date: 2003-11-19 16:23:55
Message-ID: 3FBB991B.5010402@Yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I committed the first part of the background writer process. We had a
consensus on attempting to avoid write() calls from regular backends,
but did no come to any conclusions what to do to force the kernel to
actually do some IO.

Consequently, this patch is a separate process launched by postmaster,
that periodically write()'s out "some" dirty buffers in LRU order. This
causes the buffers returned for replacement (when a backend needs to
read in a page) to be clean allways. The process does no sync(), fsync()
or any other calls thus far. Nothing has changed in the checkpoint logic
either.

The configuration options controlling the process are all PGC_SIGHUP:

# - Background writer -
#bgwriter_delay = 200 # 10-5000 milliseconds
#bgwriter_percent = 1 # 0-100% of dirty buffers
#bgwriter_maxpages = 100 # 1-1000 buffers max at once

Delay is the number of milliseconds to wait between loops. If there was
nothing to do at all in one loop (all buffers clean), then the process
will sleep for 10 seconds.

Percent is the percentage of "dirty pages" to write per loop. This is
independant of the size of the buffer pool. If percent = 0 the
postmaster will not start the process at all.

Maxpages is an upper bound to prevent the background writer from
producing a write storm if a sequential operation causes all pages of a
large buffer pool to be dirtied at once.

Jan

--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-19 16:39:00 Re: ECPG: "EXEC SQL CREATE SCHEMA foo" Broken
Previous Message Don Sceifers 2003-11-19 16:17:08 question about fixes in v7.4...