From: | Josué Maldonado <josue(at)lamundial(dot)hn> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Robert Norris <srn(at)commsecure(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Tunning postgresql |
Date: | 2003-11-19 15:06:36 |
Message-ID: | 3FBB86FC.2060805@lamundial.hn |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi Stephen,
Stephen Robert Norris wrote:
>
>
> Speaking from long experimentation, you're much, much better off making
> sure your indices and queries are optimal that messing around with
> buffer space. Buffer space tuning might get you a few percent
> performance once you pick a reasonable value; query tuning can get you
> orders of magnitude.
>
I tunned my querys and all uses indexes and seems to be fast, but when
my client app acccess the pg data it seems a little slow. I installed
MSDE (mssql limited version) and copied the same data from pg to MSDE, I
was surprised cuz running the same query with the same data and MSDE
seems to be a little bit faster, after the changes in postgresql.conf
described in the previus message pg perfomance increased a little but
still there is no big difference against MSDE, considering hardware, pg
is in a real server (dual Xeon 2.4 Ghz, 2G RAM, 3 36G SCSI drives on a
RAID5) and the server is not in production, MSDE is in a AMD athlon 1Gh
with 256RAM y should expect better performace from pg. I wonder if ODBC
could be affect performance so high, my current ODBC driver is 7.03.02.
Thanks
--
Josué Maldonado.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Johan Fredrik Øhman | 2003-11-19 15:08:47 | Storing a chain |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2003-11-19 14:56:06 | Re: Point-in-time data recovery - v.7.4 |