From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Build farm |
Date: | 2003-11-19 12:59:54 |
Message-ID: | 3FBB694A.3030908@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>Andrew Dunstan writes:
>
>
>
>>If there's general interest I'll try to cook something up. (This kind of
>>stuff is right up my alley). I'd prefer some automated display of
>>results, though. A simple CGI script should be all that's required for
>>that.
>>
>>
>
>The real problem will be to find enough machines so that the build farm
>becomes useful. IMO, that would mean *more* machines than are currently
>lines in the supported-platforms table.
>
>
"Useful" is probably subjective. That list would at least be a good
place to start, though. What combinations of variables do you think we
would need?
This would be a fairly painless way for users to be helpful to the
project, btw - the way I am envisioning things this would be fairly much
a "set and forget" process.
I'll have an example page available in a few days.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Meskes | 2003-11-19 13:20:07 | Re: ECPG: "EXEC SQL CREATE SCHEMA foo" Broken |
Previous Message | strk | 2003-11-19 12:35:55 | initdb segfaults - latest cvs |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2003-11-19 14:33:04 | Re: Release cycle length |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-11-19 09:11:55 | Re: Build farm |