Build farm

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Build farm
Date: 2003-11-18 19:36:23
Message-ID: 3FBA74B7.2090106@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

Marc G. Fournier wrote:

>On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
>
>>Maybe some sort of automated distributed build farm would be a good
>>idea. Check out http://build.samba.org/about.html to see how samba does
>>it (much lighter than the Mozilla tinderbox approach).
>>
>>We wouldn't need to be as intensive as they appear to be - maybe a once
>>or twice a day download and test run would do the trick, but it could
>>pick up lots of breakage fairly quickly.
>>
>>That is not to say that more intensive testing isn't also needed on
>>occasion.
>>
>>
>
>Check the archives on this, as its been hashed out already once at least
>... I think the big issue/problem is that nobody seems able (or wants) to
>come up with a script that could be setup in cron on machines to do this
>... something simple that would dump the output to a log file and, if
>regression tests failed, email'd the machine owner that it needs to be
>checked would do, I would think ...
>

If there's general interest I'll try to cook something up. (This kind of stuff is right up my alley). I'd prefer some automated display of results, though. A simple CGI script should be all that's required for that.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2003-11-18 19:45:35 Re: Sponsoring enterprise features
Previous Message James Rogers 2003-11-18 19:33:59 Sponsoring enterprise features

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message World Wide Web Owner 2003-11-18 21:01:09 New News Entry
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-11-18 19:13:52 Re: [pgsql-www] Release cycle length