Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

From: Marek Lewczuk <newsy(at)lewczuk(dot)com>
To: jm(at)poure(dot)com
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Date: 2003-11-18 14:43:50
Message-ID: 3FBA3026.40009@lewczuk.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Uz.ytkownik Jean-Michel POURE napisa?:

>
> For me, this makes 60% of the market at least.
> A 1% to 60% is not a small difference, it is a real gap.
>

Don't forget that success isn't always connected with technical things
(very good example is MySQL :-)) - PostgreSQL needs a good marketing,
clear strategy and identity. But for sure Win32 port will be a huge step.

There are other databases which have Win32 native version and aren't so
popular (like Firebird...)... So my proposition to PostgreSQL's team is
to think also about SMI -> Strategy Marketing Identity...

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2003-11-18 14:55:38 Re: 7.4 not yet covered on /.
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2003-11-18 14:36:32 Re: 7.4 not yet covered on /.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-18 14:51:03 Re: Release cycle length
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-18 14:43:13 Re: logical column position