Re: oh dear ...

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: oh dear ...
Date: 2003-11-16 05:27:46
Message-ID: 3FB70AD2.5060509@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>> I made up a more thorough regression test for date input formats, and
>> found that there were still some cases that were rejected :-(. Attached
>> is a more complete patch that handles all month-name cases, and
>> explicitly can not change the behavior when there's not a textual month
>> name. Documentation addition and regression test included.
>>
>> I'd like some further review of this before I risk applying it to 7.4
>> though ... anyone have time today?
>
> Everything passes for me on FreeBSD 4.8, latest CVS, "gmake check", with
> your patch applied.

Same here on RH 9.

Joe

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-Michel POURE 2003-11-16 11:03:02 Defaut database encoding
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-16 05:00:56 SRA Win32 sync() code