From: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Aleksander Kmetec <aleksander(dot)kmetec(at)intera(dot)si> |
Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Email signature |
Date: | 2003-11-14 06:40:34 |
Message-ID: | 3FB478E2.50806@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Hi Aleksander,
Yep, there's no professional IT person that I know of that uses HTML
email. Most consider it *rude* to be sent HTML email, or that the
person sending it was clueless (or made a mistake in their settings
somehow).
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>
>>Aleksander,
>>
>>
>>>I understend your concerns, but looking through my inbox I can see that
>>>everyone, except a small number of fellow programmers, is using html format
>>>for sending messges. It seems to be the standard here and plaintext
>>>messages are pretty much out of the question for business communication.
>>>I'm not kidding - sometimes I even get asked why I keep replying in
>>>plaintext! :)
>>
>>Ok, different from here, then. In California, plaintext is still the
>>standard for anything but advertisements.
>
>
> Same here ... my spam filters pick up nicely on HTML email and shuffle it
> off to where its supposed to ... no mans land :)
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2003-11-14 11:48:11 | Re: Comparing databases |
Previous Message | Roderick A. Anderson | 2003-11-14 01:43:36 | [PLUG] [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL @ opensourcexperts.com (fwd) |