Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL

From: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)myrealbox(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL
Date: 2003-11-11 22:06:13
Message-ID: 3FB15D55.6040208@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Josh Berkus wrote:

> Hmmm ....
>
>>True, but that doesn't take away from Joshua's point at all. He is
>>accurate that MySQL is GPL, and it would live on. Their interested
>>install base is large enough to establish a new developer community if
>>the MySQL company went belly up too.
>
> SO it would be more relevant to say that "it's a single-company project, which
> can and has introduced feature and licensing changes without consideration
> for the greater community." ?

Ouch.

But yep, I'd say that's accurate too.

Regards and best wishes,

Justin Clift

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2003-11-11 22:08:24 Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-11-11 21:51:40 Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL