Re: SIGPIPE handling, take two.

From: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: SIGPIPE handling, take two.
Date: 2003-11-11 10:19:55
Message-ID: 3FB0B7CB.2070602@bigfoot.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I think this is the patch I like. It does the auto-detect handling as I
> hoped. I will just do the doc updates to mention it.
>
> My only issue is that this is per-connection, while I think you have to
> create a global variable that defaults to false, and on first connect,
> check, and not after. Based on the code below, a second connection
> would have the SIGPIPE signal set to SIG_IGN, not SIG_DEF, and you
> would be back to setting SIG_IGN around each send, even though it was
> already set.
>
> Are others OK with this too?

I believe that the are some errors on the following code:

#if !defined(HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALS)
{
pqsigfunc old;
old = signal(SIGPIPE, SIG_IGN);
if (old != SIG_DFL)
conn->do_sigaction = false;
signal(SIGPIPE, old);
}
#else
{
struct sigaction oact;

if (sigaction(SIGPIPE, NULL, &oact) == 0 && oact.sa_handler != SIG_DFL)
conn->do_sigaction = false;
}
#endif /* !HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALS */

the old signal handler is not reinstated in case of
HAVE_POSIX_SIGNAL

May be this sound better:

#if !defined(HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALS)
{
pqsigfunc old;
old = signal(SIGPIPE, SIG_IGN);
if (old != SIG_DFL && old != SIG_ERR)
conn->do_sigaction = false;

if ( old != SIG_ERR )
signal(SIGPIPE, old);

}
#else
{
struct sigaction oact;
int err;

if ( (err = sigaction(SIGPIPE, NULL, &oact)) == 0 &&
oact.sa_handler != SIG_DFL)
conn->do_sigaction = false;

if ( err == 0 )
sigaction(SIGPIPE, &oact, NULL);

}
#endif /* !HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALS */

Regards
Gaetano Mendola

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gaetano Mendola 2003-11-11 10:58:22 Re: SIGPIPE handling, take two.
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-11 05:40:43 Re: SIGPIPE handling, take two.