From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Committing Resources to Win32 |
Date: | 2003-11-10 22:57:09 |
Message-ID: | 3FB017C5.8050602@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
> *nod*
>
> Joshua, can you tell us any more about the nature of your client's
> app(s)? Speculating like this in the dark is a bit fruitless.
>
I can't legally tell you much but what I can tell you is:
There application creates a great deal of processes that open and close.
On Linux which has a very light process model the performance hit is
nominal. On platforms like Win32 or Solaris where processes are
expensive, under heavy load you can see a pretty significant increase in
performance by going to a threaded model.
They are currently running our Cygwin installation which combined with
connection pooling has provided "ok" performance but nothing
worth writing home about (especially considering they compared against
Linux).
I am not going to lie, from a Windows perspective I am a little bit of a
PHB. I don't develop (personally) on Windows. However the
customer requirements are simple:
Command Prompt needs to provide a native Win32 PostgreSQL version that
supplies a reasonable proximity of performance
per the Linux native version. The Win32 native version must also
maintain the same level of transactibility as the Linux version.
My customer is a house of Windows C/C++ and they are telling me that
using CreateProcess will not generate that proximity.
They and I could be totally on crack, but my own research suggests
pretty much the same thing and the Windows programmers
that I have talked to that are not associated with this customer also
say the same thing.
What this all comes down to for us is this:
Can we (the community) develop a Win32 native version using
CreateProcess that will scale and perform at a level that
is acceptable to wide general use. Understanding that for many
operations PostgreSQL on Linux will perform as well if
not faster than the other well known database with the letter O in their
name.
Sincerely,
Joshua Drake
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-222-2783 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Editor-N-Chief - PostgreSQl.Org - http://www.postgresql.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2003-11-10 22:58:11 | Re: Committing Resources to Win32 |
Previous Message | Marsh Ray | 2003-11-10 22:45:13 | Re: Committing Resources to Win32 |