Re: [PATCHES] initdb in C

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To:
Cc: PostgreSQL Win32 port list <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] initdb in C
Date: 2003-11-08 08:37:53
Message-ID: 3FACAB61.5040305@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:

>Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
>
>>It passes all the regression tests. I have also included a diff against
>>Andrew's version so you can see my changes. It seems Andrew had a very
>>current version of initdb. The only update he missed was the change to
>>test the number of connections before shared buffers --- I made that
>>change myself.
>>
>>
>
>I had some concern about whether Andrew's rewrite had tracked all the
>recent changes to the initdb shell-script sources. Are you both
>confident that it is up to date?
>
>
>

Yes. Bruce has picked up the one change I didn't track (revision 1.204).

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-11-08 08:46:11 Re: initdb in C
Previous Message Bob Ippolito 2003-11-08 06:47:27 Re: Making PostgreSQL 7.4 (CVS) work properly on OS X 10.3 (7B85)

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-11-08 08:46:11 Re: initdb in C
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-11-08 05:42:36 Re: [PATCHES] initdb in C

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-11-08 08:46:11 Re: initdb in C
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-11-08 05:42:36 Re: [PATCHES] initdb in C