From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Committing Resources to Win32 |
Date: | 2003-11-07 10:23:05 |
Message-ID: | 3FAB7289.7070702@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Claudio Natoli wrote:
>
>Hello there,
>
>
>
>> I have arranged to have 1 full time dedicated programmer to the Win32
>>
>>
>port.
>
>That's fantastic. I've been trying to arrange the same thing at my
>company...
>
>
>
I agree, it's great.
>
>
>> Specifically, I believe and through conversations with several Win32
>>
>>
>programmers I know, that using create process is a bad idea and that we
>should move to a threaded model (at least for Win32).
>
>CreateProcess appears to be the method the core developers have decided
>upon. Unfortunately, and speaking from experience, unless either the
>decision to use MingW as a build environment is reviewed (as opposed to
>VC++, for instance), or MingW "soon" supports thread local storage
>declspecs, a threaded implementation would be just too difficult to
>integrate cleanly with the existing source base.
>
>
>
The requirement is that we can build with opensource tools. I'm quite
prepared to buy the (cheap version of) VC++, but only as a last resort.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marsh Ray | 2003-11-07 11:45:49 | Re: Committing Resources to Win32 |
Previous Message | Claudio Natoli | 2003-11-07 06:29:40 | Re: Committing Resources to Win32 |