Re: DISTINCT ... ORDER BY

From: Nabil Sayegh <postgresql(at)e-trolley(dot)de>
To:
Cc: pgsql-novice <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DISTINCT ... ORDER BY
Date: 2003-11-05 21:27:40
Message-ID: 3FA96B4C.8090505@e-trolley.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 21:06:30 +0100,
> Nabil Sayegh <postgresql(at)e-trolley(dot)de> wrote:
>
>>Ok, let's look for alternatives.
>
>
> Did you try my corrected suggestion?

Yes, and it worked, thanks.
But then I was too afraid of it being non-deterministic :(

Is this query deterministic?

TFYH
--
e-Trolley Sayegh & John, Nabil Sayegh
Tel.: 0700 etrolley /// 0700 38765539
Fax.: +49 69 8299381-8
PGP : http://www.e-trolley.de

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nabil Sayegh 2003-11-05 21:36:22 Re: DISTINCT ... ORDER BY
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2003-11-05 21:16:30 Re: DISTINCT ... ORDER BY