From: | "skennedy" <skennedy(at)tissat(dot)es> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "[ADMIN]" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Creating users in a second postgres server. |
Date: | 2003-11-05 16:02:40 |
Message-ID: | 3FA91F20.8040506@tissat.es |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Bang on Tom.
As you can see from the snippet of my mail below, I had it pg_port.
Oh well, make distclean again I suppose
Thanks.
Tom Lane wrote:
>"skennedy" <skennedy(at)tissat(dot)es> writes:
>
>
>>If I configured the server to user 5433 before building (using
>>--with-pg_port=5433 in configure) shouldn't the clients, etc
>>automatically look for port 5433?
>>
>>
>
>They should, and they do for me (I routinely run several different
>versions of PG on different ports on my development machines).
>
>Hmm ... are you sure you spelled the configure option correctly?
>It should be --with-pgport=PORTNUM. One of the less endearing aspects
>of GNU autoconf is that it won't complain about unrecognized --with-foo
>and --enable-foo switches.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oli Sennhauser | 2003-11-05 16:09:34 | Re: data format problem for upgrede from 7.1->7.3 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-11-05 15:59:24 | Re: Creating users in a second postgres server. |