From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Experimental patch for inter-page delay in VACUUM |
Date: | 2003-11-04 21:17:39 |
Message-ID: | 3FA81773.9080204@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
scott.marlowe wrote:
>On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>
>>The main problem with this is knowing which files need to be fsync'd.
>>
>>
>
>Wasn't this a problem that the win32 port had to solve by keeping a list
>of all files that need fsyncing since Windows doesn't do sync() in the
>classical sense? If so, then could we use that code to keep track of the
>files that need fsyncing?
>
>
>
according to the win32 page at
http://momjian.postgresql.org/main/writings/pgsql/win32.html this is
still to be done. I seem to recall Bruce saying that SRA had found the
solution to this, something along these lines, but I am not sure the
code is there yet (don't have access to that branch on this machine)
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Franco Bruno Borghesi | 2003-11-04 21:28:12 | What's wrong with this group by clause? |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2003-11-04 21:15:19 | Re: Open Sourcing pgManage |