From: | Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
Subject: | Re: 7.4RC1 tag'd, branched and bundled ... |
Date: | 2003-11-04 18:55:39 |
Message-ID: | 3FA7F62B.4090803@bigfoot.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 05:35:42PM +0100, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
>
>
>>I agree in general with you for these "general" arguments, but here we
>>are talking about to introduce a sleep ( removable by guc ) or not! What
>>about the hash refactoring introduced with 7.4? Are you going to
>>discourage people to use the hash?
>
>
> Hashed subselect handling was tested by lots of people during a lot of
> time, and was subject of the working port reports the last few days.
> This patch has had none of those.
>
> Of course, if you want to patch your servers with it no one will stop
> you, but it will be _your_ responsability. You can do any amount of
> testing you want to make sure it's good enough for you. And you are
> welcome to report how it did behave.
I will with pleasure.
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | markw | 2003-11-04 19:03:17 | Re: OSDL DBT-2 w/ PostgreSQL 7.3.4 and 7.4beta5 |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-11-04 18:51:41 | Re: [PATCHES] equal() perf tweak |