Re: [PATCHES] equal() perf tweak

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] equal() perf tweak
Date: 2003-11-04 17:06:33
Message-ID: 3FA7DC99.2040300@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:

><snip> excellent scheme for improving List </snip>
>
>

Just a thought - if we are messing with the List definition should we at
the same time address the strict aliasing issues arising from Node's
multiple personalities (I think it is the main offender).

Or is the intention never to do this, or not any time soon? (Either is
OK, although I suspect it will have to happen sometime as more compilers
start relying on the C99 rules more aggressively).

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-11-04 17:07:34 Re: bufmgr code question
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2003-11-04 17:02:51 minor suggestion about rule syntax

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-11-04 17:31:21 Re: [PATCHES] equal() perf tweak
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-11-04 16:40:45 Re: equal() perf tweak