From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "mlunnon (at) RWA" <mlunnon(at)rwa-net(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Custom types and arrays |
Date: | 2003-11-03 02:33:21 |
Message-ID: | 3FA5BE71.9080909@joeconway.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
mlunnon @ RWA wrote:
> Thanks for your reply tom. I'm sure it is not a mistype, I included the
> definition that I used in my script. Perhaps it is something to do with the
> cygwin installation of Postgres that I have i will try it on a Linux box.
>
The type you were referring to is a composite type:
CREATE TYPE TEST_TYPE AS (ID INTEGER, CODE VARCHAR(40));
The documentation wording could be improved (perhaps it should say
"user-defined *base* types?), but there is no support for arrays of
composite types -- or at least if there is, I've never seen it. I know
for sure that creation of a user defined composite type will not create
a corresponding array type.
Joe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron St-Pierre | 2003-11-03 02:46:19 | Re: Constraint Problem |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-11-02 22:22:48 | Re: PostgreSQL License Question |