From: | Arup Rakshit <ar(at)zeit(dot)io> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Can I add Index to make a query faster which involves joins on unnest ? |
Date: | 2018-09-13 18:17:00 |
Message-ID: | 3FA56263-735B-4146-B6F5-0003C1A953C4@zeit.io |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
The below query basically gives the result by maintaining the order of the sizes in the list.
explain analyze select
"price_levels"."name",
"price_levels"."size"
from
"price_levels"
join unnest(array['M',
'L',
'XL',
'2XL',
'3XL',
'4XL',
'5XL',
'6XL',
'S']) with ordinality t(size,
ord)
using (size)
order by
t.size
I have a Btree index on the size column.
Explain output is:
Merge Join (cost=4.61..5165.38 rows=60000 width=46) (actual time=0.157..57.872 rows=60000 loops=1)
Merge Cond: ((price_levels.size)::text = t.size)
-> Index Scan using price_levels_size_idx on price_levels (cost=0.29..4111.05 rows=60000 width=14) (actual time=0.044..25.941 rows=60000 loops=1)
-> Sort (cost=4.32..4.57 rows=100 width=32) (actual time=0.108..3.946 rows=53289 loops=1)
Sort Key: t.size
Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 25kB
-> Function Scan on unnest t (cost=0.00..1.00 rows=100 width=32) (actual time=0.030..0.033 rows=9 loops=1)
Planning time: 0.667 ms
Execution time: 62.846 ms
Thanks,
Arup Rakshit
ar(at)zeit(dot)io
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rob Sargent | 2018-09-13 18:57:15 | Re: Can I add Index to make a query faster which involves joins on unnest ? |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-09-13 03:11:14 | Re: scram-sha-256 authentication broken in FIPS mode |