Re: Rule regression failure freebsd?

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rule regression failure freebsd?
Date: 2003-10-31 14:29:11
Message-ID: 3FA271B7.3060105@Yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jan Wieck wrote:

> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>>> See attached regression.diffs.
>>
>> Looks like Jan forgot to update this expected file to match his changes.
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>
> Not exactly,
>
> I didn't run the parallel regression test and thus missed that rules and
> foreign_key are in the same group and that the execution of the latter
> now affects the result of the former.
>
> I'll try to fix it by moving the test into rule.sql (it's placed there
> as wrong as it's in foreign_key). If that doesn't work either I will
> back it out as we don't want bigger regression test rearrangements at
> this stage in the release cycle.

The test is now in rule.sql.

Jan

--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-10-31 15:57:55 Re: Call for port reports
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-10-31 13:56:33 Re: static pg_dump