From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, Postgresql Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Press Release |
Date: | 2003-10-30 00:57:14 |
Message-ID: | 3FA061EA.80102@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
>Why are you running a vacuum full -- forgot to do a regular vacuum often
>enough?
>
No because if we don't run a vacuum full on this (actually a couple of)
machine
then the machine slows down to a crawl over time. Vacuums are run every
4 or 5 hours
and a vacuum full every night.
I am obviously missing something and relying on past knowledge.
J
>PostgreSQL also won't be answering queries if I unplug the
>machine it is on, toss it into the back of a plane and fly it to another
>data centre.
>
>
>
O.k. this was a ridiculous analogy.
>We should only be considering standard operation.
>
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-222-2783 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Editor-N-Chief - PostgreSQl.Org - http://www.postgresql.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-10-30 00:58:05 | Re: Press Release |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2003-10-30 00:53:57 | Re: Press Release |