Re: pg_clog & vacuum oddness

Well, you know, I looked at the list and saw only template0, template1 &
our working DB. So just for kicks I vacuumed template1. That cleared the
directory. To my knowledge we did not modify template1 one when we setup
the database initially, so perhaps it just needed a vacuum to set the
stage correctly. Either that or during our data import, there was
something in the import file that referenced template1 which created a
need for vacuuming.
Whatever the case, this was an interesting exercise which I'm sure will
prove useful in the future.
Thank you.

--
Bill MacArthur
Webmaster
DHS Club

Jeff wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 11:53:38 -0500
> DHS Webmaster <webmaster(at)dhs-club(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > We vacuum our working database nightly. Although this is not a 'full',
> > we don't exclude any tables. We don't do anything with template1
> > (knowingly), so we do not perform any maintenance on it either.
>
> Why not go through the list in pg_database to make sure you didn't
> forget about any (like I did).
>
> given that template0 and 1 rarely change.. I don't see why we'd need to
> vacuum them
>
> --
> Jeff Trout <jeff(at)jefftrout(dot)com>
> http://www.jefftrout.com/
> http://www.stuarthamm.net/