Re: Open items

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Open items
Date: 2003-10-28 03:45:53
Message-ID: 3F9DE671.6020204@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello,

Well the reason I brought it up was the rather interesting discussion
that Jan had today about Vacuum.
I was wondering if we were going to explore that before the 7.4 release?

Sincerely,

Joshua Drake

Bruce Momjian wrote:

>Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>
>>On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Hello,
>>>
>>> Based on the current open items... when do we expect release?
>>>
>>>
>>As soon as the items are fixed? :)
>>
>>
>
>I am confused why we aren't wrapping up these items. I have waited for
>the people who proposed these ideas to jump in and do them, but I might
>start on them myself soon.
>
>
>

--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-222-2783 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Editor-N-Chief - PostgreSQl.Org - http://www.postgresql.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-10-28 03:48:21 Slightly inconsistent behaviour in regproc?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-28 03:40:52 Re: Horology failures