Re: is GiST still alive?

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Gregor Zeitlinger <gregor(at)zeitlinger(dot)de>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: is GiST still alive?
Date: 2003-10-23 13:10:46
Message-ID: 3F97D356.1070502@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-chat pgsql-hackers

> You couldn't have said better what I meant.
> I store the xml already parsed. You can navigate right along. To the
> parent, the previous, the next elemnt or the first or last child.

Which is the whole point of indexing it...

>>I use XML a lot for all sorts of purposes, but it is appropriate for
>>data transfer rather than data storage, IMNSHO.
>
> Right now, you're quite right. But I want to change that.

No point, it's a data exchange format, it's not usefull for data storage.

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-chat by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Makoto Yui 2003-10-23 13:38:09 Re: is GiST still alive?
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-10-23 13:09:11 Re: is GiST still alive?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Makoto Yui 2003-10-23 13:38:09 Re: is GiST still alive?
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-10-23 13:09:11 Re: is GiST still alive?