From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Gregor Zeitlinger <gregor(at)zeitlinger(dot)de> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: is GiST still alive? |
Date: | 2003-10-23 13:10:46 |
Message-ID: | 3F97D356.1070502@familyhealth.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-chat pgsql-hackers |
> You couldn't have said better what I meant.
> I store the xml already parsed. You can navigate right along. To the
> parent, the previous, the next elemnt or the first or last child.
Which is the whole point of indexing it...
>>I use XML a lot for all sorts of purposes, but it is appropriate for
>>data transfer rather than data storage, IMNSHO.
>
> Right now, you're quite right. But I want to change that.
No point, it's a data exchange format, it's not usefull for data storage.
Chris
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Makoto Yui | 2003-10-23 13:38:09 | Re: is GiST still alive? |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-10-23 13:09:11 | Re: is GiST still alive? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Makoto Yui | 2003-10-23 13:38:09 | Re: is GiST still alive? |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-10-23 13:09:11 | Re: is GiST still alive? |