From: | Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Mark Harrison <mh(at)pixar(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: constant time count(*) ? |
Date: | 2003-10-15 18:59:09 |
Message-ID: | 3F8D98FD.5010500@wildenhain.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi Mark,
Mark Harrison wrote:
> We're looking into moving some data from mysql to postgresql, and
> notice that count(*) does not seem to be a constant-time function
> as it seems to be in mysql.
>
> planb=# explain select count(*) from assets;
> QUERY PLAN
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Aggregate (cost=22.50..22.50 rows=1 width=0)
> -> Seq Scan on assets (cost=0.00..20.00 rows=1000 width=0)
> (2 rows)
>
> Is there a way to optimize count(*) such that it does not have
> to do a sequential scan? We use this on some big tables and it
> is slowing down processing quite a lot.
How do you need an unqualified
select count(*) on a table so often
it is making a problem?
Regards
Tino
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2003-10-15 19:02:06 | Re: Getting error codes for failed queries? |
Previous Message | Kaarel | 2003-10-15 18:58:55 | Re: Triggers tutorial |