Re: int1? types?

From: Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)fireserve(dot)net>
To: elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>
Cc: Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>, CSN <cool_screen_name90001(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: int1? types?
Date: 2003-10-11 03:18:31
Message-ID: 3F877687.2040406@fireserve.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

elein wrote:

>I think I was thinking of how it is passed around internally,
>the C representation, rather than how it is stored on the disk.
>These are different things.
>
>So, one byte user defined data types are possible. And that
>means that the *storage* will be one byte (modulo alignment).
>
>
The compiler is free to word order them as it pleases, that is why there
is the command 'sizeof'.

--
"You are behaving like a man",
is an insult from some women,
a compliment from an good woman.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Claudio Lapidus 2003-10-11 05:00:03 "slicing" records
Previous Message Ron Johnson 2003-10-11 02:01:12 Re: Index/Foreign Key Question