Re: [HACKERS] Sun performance - Major discovery!

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Sun performance - Major discovery!
Date: 2003-10-09 02:07:11
Message-ID: 3F84C2CF.5000000@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

>>Well, this is really embarassing. I can't imagine why we would not set
>>at least -O on all platforms. Looking at the template files, I see
>>these have no optimization set:
>
>
>> freebsd (non-alpha)
>
>
> I'm wondering what that had in mind:
>
> http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql-server/src/template/freebsd.diff?r1=1.10&r2=1.11

When I used to build pgsql on freebsd/alpha, I would get heaps of GCC
warnings saying 'optimisations for the alpha are broken'. I can't
remember if that meant anything more than just -O or not though.

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-09 02:10:07 Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY (was Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta)
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-10-09 02:05:06 Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY (was Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta)

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Browne 2003-10-09 02:07:46 Re: Compare rows
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-09 01:48:14 Re: [HACKERS] Sun performance - Major discovery!