| From: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_get_ruledef and extra line breaks |
| Date: | 2003-09-29 09:14:02 |
| Message-ID: | 3F77F7DA.9060109@pse-consulting.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I notice that the pretty printing version of pg_get_ruledef inserts extra
>newlines whereas all the others pretty functions (except view defs) do
>not. In fact, Andreas argued against a version of pg_get_triggerdef()
>that added extra newlines.
>
No, I did not *in general*, but for now because there's no node
traversing and a pretty formatted query can be easily constructed by
yourself as for all other non-pg_get_xxx supported objects.
>
> CREATE RULE asdfx AS
> ON INSERT TO test
> WHERE 1 = 1 OR 1 = 2 OR 1 = 3 OR 1 = 5 DO INSTEAD NOTHING;
> CREATE RULE asdf AS
> ON INSERT TO test
> WHERE 1 = 1 OR 1 = 2 OR 1 = 3 OR 1 = 5 DO INSTEAD NOTHING;
>(8 rows)
>
>
>Are those newlines really necessary? They seem a bit out of place?
>
Matter of taste. Things look different if action is not NOTHING, but
something more.
Regards,
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-09-29 09:21:39 | Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY (was Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta) |
| Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2003-09-29 09:04:38 | Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY (was Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta) |