Re: State of Beta 2

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)fireserve(dot)net>, Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, PgSQL General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: State of Beta 2
Date: 2003-09-28 01:45:13
Message-ID: 3F763D29.3060606@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


>
>$$$ -- I wasn't looking to purchase a programmer. :-)
>
>

Well sometimes it takes money to get things done. Personally I don't see
a big need
for pg_upgrade but there was enough people making noise about it that it
made sense
to make the proposal. Several people did come back and offer to cough up
a little bit
but not enough to get the project done.

My prefernce is to see all that work going into pg_dump, pg_dumpall and
pg_restore.

Sincerely,

Joshua Drake

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2003-09-28 01:47:03 Re: Rewriting pg_upgrade (was Re: State of Beta 2)
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-09-28 01:42:02 Re: Rewriting pg_upgrade (was Re: State of Beta 2)