| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, mlg3 <mlg3(at)mail15(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PL contribution guidelines? |
| Date: | 2003-09-25 20:01:28 |
| Message-ID: | 3F734998.5090809@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
Yes plPHP is under the BSD style PHP license. We are going to dual
license on next release which is REAL soon
now.
Sincerley,
Joshua Drake
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>scott.marlowe wrote:
>
>
>>On 25 Sep 2003, Robert Treat wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>oh.. and i'm not forgetting plphp, but it has both licensing issues and
>>>isn't ready for prime time.
>>>
>>>
>>I thought there weren't any license issues, except mayhaps with the name.
>>
>>http://www.php.net/license/3_0.txt
>>
>>
>
>That is what I thought too. Originally PlPHP was stated as being
>released as GPL (which the author thought was used by PHP), but later
>corrected to be the BSD license.
>
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Keith Bottner | 2003-09-25 20:03:57 | Re: [HACKERS] Threads vs Processes |
| Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2003-09-25 19:57:27 | Re: [ADMIN] postgres 6.2 vacuum |