Re: Which RPMs should we use: ours or wxWindows ones...

From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: jm(at)poure(dot)com, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Which RPMs should we use: ours or wxWindows ones...
Date: 2003-09-25 16:51:09
Message-ID: 3F731CFD.7060102@pse-consulting.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Dave Page wrote:

>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:jm(at)poure(dot)com]
>>Sent: 25 September 2003 14:58
>>To: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
>>Cc: Adam H. Pendleton; Dave Page; Hiroshi Saito;
>>pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de
>>Subject: Which RPMs should we use: ours or wxWindows ones...
>>
>>
>>My wxGTK2ud RPMs are getting quite old compared to wxWindows
>>new ones. I am
>>currently rebuilding the new RPMs from wxWindows CVS.
>>
>>
>>
>
>Note to porters: Please DO NOT do this on any boxes used for building
>binary pgAdmin releases.
>
>pgAdmin 1.0.0 is scheduled for release on Friday and should be built
>against the latest version of wxWindows on Snake, NOT fresh CVS code.
>
>
I'm checking wx CVS too, and it's mostly ok *except* for that clipboard
fix/non-fix, so for release we should stick to our version. There's no
reason for us to take another one at the moment, because no new features
are used.

After that, we might update our snapshot.

Regards,
Andreas

In response to

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2003-09-25 18:10:22 Re: Which RPMs should we use: ours or wxWindows ones...
Previous Message Jean-Michel POURE 2003-09-25 16:10:04 Re: Translation