| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu>, Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)fireserve(dot)net>, Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, PgSQL General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: State of Beta 2 |
| Date: | 2003-09-22 21:36:10 |
| Message-ID: | 3F6F6B4A.7010104@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
>Also, to be blunt: if pg_dump still has problems after all the years
>we've put into it, what makes you think that in-place upgrade will
>magically work reliably?
>
>
Fair enough. On another front then... would all this energy we are
talking about with pg_upgrade
be better spent on pg_dump/pg_dumpall/pg_restore?
>>This I am hoping
>>changes in 7.4 as we moved to a pure "c" implementation.
>>
>>
Your right that was a mistype. I was very tired and reading three
different threads at the same time.
Sincerely,
Joshua Drake
>Eh? AFAIR, pg_dump has always been in C.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-222-2783 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
The most reliable support for the most reliable Open Source database.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2003-09-22 22:14:59 | Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL |
| Previous Message | Evil Azrael | 2003-09-22 21:03:19 | BSD License |