From: | Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, Lista dyskusyjna pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PG + PHP, was Re: Zend survey result about dbms... |
Date: | 2003-09-20 22:37:51 |
Message-ID: | 3F6CD6BF.5030206@mascari.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-php |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com> writes:
>
>>In the past, one hack would be to use setenv() and getenv() of the
>>backend to implement these functions. What about a contrib module that:
>
>
> Uh, what exactly does it buy you to involve an environment variable
> in this process? I think it just adds fragility. (For example,
> exposing setenv to the user creates the risk that he'll overwrite
> something of importance, like PATH.)
Actually, I meant that setenv() and getenv() would only be used to
store the memory address of a privately manipulated variable map. I
did not mean that it should actually be used to store and retrieve the
variables themselves. If there is already a way to palloc() memory
using a key that lives for the lifetime of a backend, then that's
obviously the way to go. I was proceeding under the assumption that
there wasn't.
Mike Mascari
mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mike Mascari | 2003-09-20 22:42:12 | Re: PG + PHP, was Re: Zend survey result about dbms... |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2003-09-20 22:37:37 | Re: About GPL and proprietary software |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mike Mascari | 2003-09-20 22:42:12 | Re: PG + PHP, was Re: Zend survey result about dbms... |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-20 22:29:01 | Re: PG + PHP, was Re: Zend survey result about dbms... |