From: | Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)fireserve(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Duffey, Kevin" <KDuffey(at)marketron(dot)com>, PgSQL General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Scalability (both vertical and horizontal)? |
Date: | 2003-09-18 21:34:00 |
Message-ID: | 3F6A24C8.3050802@fireserve.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
scott.marlowe wrote:
>On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Duffey, Kevin wrote:
>
>
>
>>We are looking for information regarding any capabilities of PostgreSQL
>>in regards to scalability. Ideally we want to be able to scale in both
>>directions. What sort of solutions are out there for either or both
>>directions of scalability? Specifically, open-source solutions would be
>>most in need, but commercial applications are fine as well.
>>
>>
>
>As for horizontal scaling, you could look at ERserver for that. Setup one
>master writer and a bunch of slave boxes to handle the majority of the
>queries. There's not been a bunch of work into horizontal scaling really,
>with most of the clustering software for postgresql aiming at failover /
>high availability, not massive parallelization of read and / or writes.
>
Are there any databases that do well in horizontal scaling? What really
*IS* Oracle Real Application Clusters?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-09-18 21:34:01 | Re: PostgreSQL versus MySQL |
Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2003-09-18 21:33:11 | Re: need for in-place upgrades (was Re: State of Beta 2) |