From: | Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)fireserve(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Rawnsley <ronz(at)ravensfield(dot)com> |
Cc: | Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, PgSQL General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: State of Beta 2 |
Date: | 2003-09-18 17:22:53 |
Message-ID: | 3F69E9ED.4090304@fireserve.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Andrew Rawnsley wrote:
>
> eRserver should be able to migrate the data. If you make heavy use of
> sequences, schemas and other such things it won't help you for those.
>
> <snip>
> Using eRserver may help you work around the problem, given certain
> conditions. It doesn't solve it. I think if we can get Mr. Drake's
> initiative off the ground we may at least figure out if there is a
> solution.
So a replication application
IS
a method to migrate
OR CAN BE MADE
to do it somewhat
AND is a RELATED
project to the migration tool.
Again, I wonder what on the TODO's or any other roadmap is related and
should be part of a comprehensive plan to drain the swamp and not just
club alligators over the head?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-09-18 17:50:30 | Re: State of Beta 2 |
Previous Message | Andrew Rawnsley | 2003-09-18 17:11:01 | Re: State of Beta 2 |