Re: State of Beta 2

From: Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)fireserve(dot)net>
To: Andrew Rawnsley <ronz(at)ravensfield(dot)com>
Cc: Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, PgSQL General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: State of Beta 2
Date: 2003-09-18 17:22:53
Message-ID: 3F69E9ED.4090304@fireserve.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Andrew Rawnsley wrote:

>
> eRserver should be able to migrate the data. If you make heavy use of
> sequences, schemas and other such things it won't help you for those.
>
> <snip>

> Using eRserver may help you work around the problem, given certain
> conditions. It doesn't solve it. I think if we can get Mr. Drake's
> initiative off the ground we may at least figure out if there is a
> solution.

So a replication application
IS
a method to migrate
OR CAN BE MADE
to do it somewhat
AND is a RELATED
project to the migration tool.

Again, I wonder what on the TODO's or any other roadmap is related and
should be part of a comprehensive plan to drain the swamp and not just
club alligators over the head?

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2003-09-18 17:50:30 Re: State of Beta 2
Previous Message Andrew Rawnsley 2003-09-18 17:11:01 Re: State of Beta 2