From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Rawnsley <ronz(at)ravensfield(dot)com> |
Cc: | PgSQL General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: State of Beta 2 |
Date: | 2003-09-16 21:23:13 |
Message-ID: | 3F677F41.6030609@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hello,
I would imagine that it would be maintainable but it would be
something that would have to be
constantly maintained from release to release. It would have to become
part of the actual project or
it would die.
The reason I chose six months is that I figure it will be 30 days of
full time just dinking around to make
sure that we have a solid handle on how things are done for this part of
the code. Then we would know
what we think it would take. It was a gut theory but I believe it can be
done or at least a huge jump on it.
Sincerely,
Joshua Drake
Andrew Rawnsley wrote:
>
> Let me run some numbers. I'm interested in the idea, and I think I can
> push one of my clients on it.
>
> Do the core folk (Tom/Bruce/Jan/etc) think this is doable with that
> sort of time commitment? Is it maintainable over time? Or are we
> pissing in the wind?
>
> On Tuesday, September 16, 2003, at 03:59 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>>
>>>
>>> And that has nothing to do with user need as a whole, since the care
>>> level I mentioned is predicated by the developer interest level.
>>> While I know, Marc, how the whole project got started (I have read
>>> the first posts), and I appreciate that you, Bruce, Thomas, and
>>> Vadim started the original core team because you were and are users
>>> of PostgreSQL, I sincerely believe that in this instance you are out
>>> of touch with this need of many of today's userbase. And I say that
>>> with full knowledge of PostgreSQL Inc.'s support role. If given the
>>> choice between upgrading capability, PITR, and Win32 support, my
>>> vote would go to upgrading. Then migrating to PITR won't be a PITN.
>>
>>
>> If someone is willing to pony up 2000.00 per month for a period of at
>> least 6 months, I will dedicated one of my programmers to the task.
>> So if you want it bad enough there it is. I will donate all changes,
>> patches etc.. to the project and I will cover the additional costs
>> that are over and above the 12,000. If we get it done quicker, all
>> the better.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Joshua Drake
>>
>> --
>> Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
>> Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
>> +1-503-222-2783 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
>> The most reliable support for the most reliable Open Source database.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>>
> --------------------
>
> Andrew Rawnsley
> President
> The Ravensfield Digital Resource Group, Ltd.
> (740) 587-0114
> www.ravensfield.com
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-222-2783 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
The most reliable support for the most reliable Open Source database.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2003-09-16 21:39:47 | Re: State of Beta 2 |
Previous Message | Andrew Rawnsley | 2003-09-16 21:20:03 | Re: State of Beta 2 |