From: | "Keith G(dot) Murphy" <keithmur(at)mindspring(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: The ..... worm |
Date: | 2003-09-11 17:22:37 |
Message-ID: | 3F60AF5D.7060905@mindspring.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 14:12:43 +0200,
> Francois Suter <dba(at)paragraf(dot)ch> wrote:
>
>>I am not sure this is really going to help, because the e-mail
>>addresses are also harvested from the web-based archives. Still doesn't
>>such a reknowned ML tool as Majordomo have a feature that can hide
>>e-mail addresses (like automatically write them as someone AT any DOT
>>com) in the web archives?
>
>
> That isn't a real solution. Any standard way of munging addresses in a
> reversable way will result in spammers writing a tool to extract the
> addresses. So if you don't spammers to get addresses off the web archives,
> then you don't want addresses there.
>
Check this out:
They only show graphical images of the return addresses. You'd have to
use text recognition software to harvest them.
Don't know what software they use, though; might be homegrown for all I
know.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dennis Gearon | 2003-09-11 17:36:45 | Re: The ..... worm |
Previous Message | Jonathan Bartlett | 2003-09-11 17:08:48 | Re: Picture with Postgres and Delphi |