| From: | Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hans-Jürgen Schönig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, eg(at)cybertec(dot)at |
| Subject: | Re: Is it a memory leak in PostgreSQL 7.4beta? |
| Date: | 2003-09-01 11:00:16 |
| Message-ID: | 3F5326C0.3020505@paradise.net.nz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
>
> I can hardly imagine that the backend started working with 9mb of
> memory. what did you do that PostgreSQL needed so much memory from the
> beginning??? are you using the default settings? usually the
> postmaster does not need more than 3mb at startup (in this scenario).
Setup is completely default - i.e run initdb, and start the server
after that.
I am running an embedded sql program to do the test, rather than an sql
script
(see enclosed), not sure why/if that would make any difference.
On the cautionary side, note that I am using a beta Linux distribution too.
regards
Mark
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| leak.sqc.gz | application/x-macbinary | 1008 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | ohp | 2003-09-01 11:57:11 | Re: Index creation takes for ever |
| Previous Message | Julian Mehnle | 2003-09-01 08:41:38 | "Allow inherited tables to inherit index/primary key" -- about when? |