From: | "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 8 way Intel Xeon system |
Date: | 2003-08-27 07:00:33 |
Message-ID: | 3F4CA469.27749.32D48FD@localhost |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 27 Aug 2003 at 14:07, Castle, Lindsay wrote:
> I'm mainly interested in what I should concentrate on from a
> Linux/PostgreSQL config point of view to see if we can take advantage of the
> extra CPUs. - Yes it's overkill but this is a piece of surplus hardware we
> don't have to buy.
First of all whatever you do, add multiple connections using a middle layer.
That will keep your CPU busy.
Of course there are few things need to be done over single connection but this
should help at least in some scenarios.
> Perhaps some may say Linux isn't the best option for an 8 CPU server but
> this is what I have to work with for reasons we won't get into :-)
I think if you can afford a performance benchmark trial, give 2.6.0-testx a
try. They should be much better than 2.4.x.
> The current usage is along the lines of a few thousands updates spread over
> the space of a few hours in the morning then followed by a thousand select
> queries to do some reporting.
In case of such IO intensive and update/delete heavy load, might be a good idea
to move WAL to a separate SCSI channel. I believe merely moving it to another
drive would not yield as much boost.
> Currently RedHat 9 with PostgreSQL 7.3.2 installed.
Get 7.4CVS head. and don't forget to use a autovacuum daemon. It's in contrib
dir.
HTH
Bye
Shridhar
--
Ogden's Law: The sooner you fall behind, the more time you have to catch up.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron Johnson | 2003-08-27 08:12:31 | Re: Replication Ideas |
Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-08-27 06:54:40 | Re: Sun vs a P2. Interesting results. |