From: | Chris Travers <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Replication Ideas |
Date: | 2003-08-25 22:15:25 |
Message-ID: | 3F4A8A7D.30308@travelamericas.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Tom Lane wrote:
>Chris Travers <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com> writes:
>
>
>>Yes I have. Postgres-r is not a high-availability solution which is
>>capable of transparent failover,
>>
>>
>
>What makes you say that? My understanding is it's supposed to survive
>loss of individual servers.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
>
>
My mistake. I must have gotten them confused with another
(asynchronous) replication project.
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2003-08-25 22:27:54 | Re: move to usenet? |
Previous Message | Gregory S. Williamson | 2003-08-25 21:28:10 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2003-08-25 22:23:47 | Re: postgresql 7.3.2 bug on date '1901-12-13' and '1901-12 |
Previous Message | Carlos Guzman Alvarez | 2003-08-25 21:14:33 | SSL Connections |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2003-08-25 22:28:09 | Re: Replication Ideas |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-08-25 21:09:19 | Re: Replication Ideas |