Re: Replication Ideas

From: Chris Travers <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Replication Ideas
Date: 2003-08-25 22:15:25
Message-ID: 3F4A8A7D.30308@travelamericas.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Tom Lane wrote:

>Chris Travers <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com> writes:
>
>
>>Yes I have. Postgres-r is not a high-availability solution which is
>>capable of transparent failover,
>>
>>
>
>What makes you say that? My understanding is it's supposed to survive
>loss of individual servers.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
>
>
My mistake. I must have gotten them confused with another
(asynchronous) replication project.

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2003-08-25 22:27:54 Re: move to usenet?
Previous Message Gregory S. Williamson 2003-08-25 21:28:10

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2003-08-25 22:23:47 Re: postgresql 7.3.2 bug on date '1901-12-13' and '1901-12
Previous Message Carlos Guzman Alvarez 2003-08-25 21:14:33 SSL Connections

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Browne 2003-08-25 22:28:09 Re: Replication Ideas
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-08-25 21:09:19 Re: Replication Ideas