| From: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomka Gergely <tomka(at)zeus(dot)gau(dot)hu> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Tests |
| Date: | 2003-08-22 21:00:44 |
| Message-ID: | 3F46847C.4010900@potentialtech.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Tomka Gergely wrote:
> 2003-08-22 ragyogó napján Robert Treat ezt üzente:
>
>>On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 14:16, Bill Moran wrote:
>>
>>>>>>What test are interesting? Plese give us tips and ideas. The guy has time
>>>>>>for other test.
>>>>>
>>>>>It's a shame you didn't test ufs+softupdates. I'd be curious to see how
>>>>>it stacked up against the others.
>>>>
>>>>Shame? I smell here a harcore BSD fighter :)
>>>
>>>Well, I suppose ...
>>
>>Well I'm not a hardcore bsd fighter and I'd like to see how it stacks up
>>as well. UFS+softupdates is supposed to be a very safe combination, if
>>it performs well enough I could see a recommendation for it for those
>>who are willing to look beyond linux.
>
>
> The guy who do the test have only a few weeks *bsd-experience, and i dont
> have bsd experience at all. The guy now planning tests on BSD, but he
> need some time to build up a good relationship with the *BSD.
>
> Ps.: i am a harcore linux-fgihter, so sorry :)
Well, as much as I _am_ a die-hard BSD geek, I'm far more interested in
knowing what platform is really best when I need a top-notch PostgreSQL
server.
I'm going to try to force some time this weekend to do some tests ...
we'll see if I succeed ...
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-08-22 22:17:33 | Re: Tests |
| Previous Message | Tomka Gergely | 2003-08-22 20:54:05 | Re: Tests |