From: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tomka Gergely <tomka(at)zeus(dot)gau(dot)hu> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Tests |
Date: | 2003-08-21 18:16:59 |
Message-ID: | 3F450C9B.6000201@potentialtech.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Tomka Gergely wrote:
> 2003-08-21 ragyogó napján Bill Moran ezt üzente:
>
>
>>Tomka Gergely wrote:
>>
>>>http://195.199.65.92/~horvaths/pgperformance.html
>>>
>>>One of my friend do these tests. We think about the best filesystem for
>>>the Linux/Postgres systems.
>>>
>>>The four test was:
>>>
>>>teszt1 - 10.000 inserts
>>>teszt2 - 10.inserts, 10 in one trans.
>>>teszt3 - 14.000.000 inserts, 1.000 in one trans.
>>>teszt4 - "Select count(*)" on the big table.
>>>
>>>What test are interesting? Plese give us tips and ideas. The guy has time
>>>for other test.
>>
>>It's a shame you didn't test ufs+softupdates. I'd be curious to see how
>>it stacked up against the others.
>
> Shame? I smell here a harcore BSD fighter :)
Well, I suppose ...
> Maybe sometime he run
> tests on *SD, but now we need linux data.
"He" has had it on his list of things to do for months.
And if I ever get enough free moments, I will test *both* BSD and Linux,
because I'm terribly biased towards BSD because that's all I use.
In addition to being interested in how FreeBSD's ufs+softupdates compares
to the variety of Linux journalling filesystems, I'm also interested to
compare FreeBSD's performance on ext2fs and FAT to Linux's peformance on
those same filesystems.
It's a "shame" because I simply haven't found the time yet.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Your Name | 2003-08-21 20:11:37 | Re: Sorting a query on a view ignores an index |
Previous Message | Tomka Gergely | 2003-08-21 17:55:18 | Re: Tests |