From: | "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Insert performance |
Date: | 2003-08-19 06:28:45 |
Message-ID: | 3F4210F5.12800.E6D73AE@localhost |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 18 Aug 2003 at 9:57, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Chris,
>
> > My expectations of a Netra wouldn't be terribly high, either; they
> > seem to exist as a product so that people that need a cheap Sun box
> > have an option. They are mostly running IDE disk, and the latest
> > IA-32 hardware is likely to have newer faster interface options.
>
> Neither are ours ... we bought an array of 1U Netras as a dot-com closeout.
> At $330 per machine including OS, they were a darned good deal, and with 4 of
> them the redundancy makes up for the lack of individual server performance.
I am sure they would run much better with linux on them rather than solaris..
Bye
Shridhar
--
Shannon's Observation: Nothing is so frustrating as a bad situation that is
beginning to improve.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-08-19 06:33:26 | Re: Insert performance |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-08-19 04:24:38 | Re: bad join performance |