Re: Insert performance

From: "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Insert performance
Date: 2003-08-19 06:28:45
Message-ID: 3F4210F5.12800.E6D73AE@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 18 Aug 2003 at 9:57, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Chris,
>
> > My expectations of a Netra wouldn't be terribly high, either; they
> > seem to exist as a product so that people that need a cheap Sun box
> > have an option. They are mostly running IDE disk, and the latest
> > IA-32 hardware is likely to have newer faster interface options.
>
> Neither are ours ... we bought an array of 1U Netras as a dot-com closeout.
> At $330 per machine including OS, they were a darned good deal, and with 4 of
> them the redundancy makes up for the lack of individual server performance.

I am sure they would run much better with linux on them rather than solaris..

Bye
Shridhar

--
Shannon's Observation: Nothing is so frustrating as a bad situation that is
beginning to improve.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shridhar Daithankar 2003-08-19 06:33:26 Re: Insert performance
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-08-19 04:24:38 Re: bad join performance