Re: Anomaly with SUM().

From: Anthony Best <abest(at)digitalflex(dot)net>
To: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Anomaly with SUM().
Date: 2003-08-08 20:01:15
Message-ID: 3F34018B.2080403@digitalflex.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Stephan Szabo wrote:

>On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Anthony Best wrote:
>
>
>
>>I've noticed that the SUM() seems to overflow under some situations.
>>
>>The only difference is the order that the data is retrived from the
>>database.
>>
>>
>
>Is amount a float type column (float4 or float8)? If so, you're probably
>just running into issues with float precision problems. Changing the
>order of the operations can change the final value of a sequence of
>operations on float.
>
>
It's "double precision." (Which is float8?).

So, should I tweak my join to preserve order, or something else?

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-08-08 20:08:50 Re: Trying to create a GiST index in 7.3
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-08-08 19:50:55 Re: Anomaly with SUM().