Re: TODO items

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TODO items
Date: 2003-08-08 17:38:03
Message-ID: 3F33DFFB.7010909@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus wrote:
>>>Actually, now that I look at it again, it is referring to procedures,
>>>not functions. Maybe just make it:
>>>
>>>o Add capability to create and call PROCEDURES
>
> OK. I need to put a full proposal behind this once 7.4 is in the can.
> However, this is largely academic until we get someone who really wants to
> take ownership of PL/pgSQL and has the coding skills (I have the former but
> not the latter).
>

This isn't isolated to just PL/pgSQL, just like the ability to create
and call functions isn't. Support for PROCEDUREs in the backend is a
prerequisite to being able to use PL/pgSQL to create procedures. It is
necessary but not sufficient.

Similarly, if we want to support IN/OUT or named parameters, it isn't a
PL/pgSQL issue per se, it is a general one.

Joe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-08-08 17:42:25 Re: src/interfaces/cli
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-08-08 17:36:08 WITH HOLD and pooled connections